CO129-075 - Public Offices - 1859 — Page 109

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

116

February 16th. The Royal George was chartered by M. Gerard - she was measured, fitted, and inspected at Hongkong before proceeding to Macao to take her emigrants on board - and the application for clearance at that Port was founded on the allegation that she would thereby probably save 8 days on her voyage, and that there were greater facilities for clearing at Hongkong and Macao than at Canton.

The application was supported by the Emigration Officer and the Acting Attorney General, but was refused by the Registrar-General of Hongkong, on the grounds (1) that Macao was not a "thremse" [?], and (2) that it was uncertain whether a British Consul would always be maintained there. These appeared to us insufficient grounds for the decision - and Sir E. Bulwer Lytton having concurred in that opinion, it was conveyed to Sir J. Bowring his disapproval of it.

Sir J. Bowring's present despatch is an answer to that of Sir E. Bulwer Lytton. He expresses his satisfaction that the Secretary of State's decision on the case did not reach him until recently, after he had prepared his reply.

Edit History

2026-05-18 13:41:55 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
116 February 16th. The Royal George was chartered by M. Gerard - she was measured, fitted, and inspected at Hongkong before proceeding to Macao to take her emigrants on board - and the application for clearance at that Port was founded on the allegation that she would thereby probably save 8 days on her voyage, and that there were greater facilities for clearing at Hongkong and Macao than at Canton. The application was supported by the Emigration Officer and the Acting Attorney General, but was refused by the Registrar-General of Hongkong, on the grounds (1) that Macao was not a "thremse" [?], and (2) that it was uncertain whether a British Consul would always be maintained there. These appeared to us insufficient grounds for the decision - and Sir E. Bulwer Lytton having concurred in that opinion, it was conveyed to Sir J. Bowring his disapproval of it. Sir J. Bowring's present despatch is an answer to that of Sir E. Bulwer Lytton. He expresses his satisfaction that the Secretary of State's decision on the case did not reach him until recently, after he had prepared his reply.
Baseline (Original)
اردادي 116 zane Februariglast. The Royal George wal chartered by M. Gerard- she was measured, fitted, and inspected at Houghong before proceeding to Macas to take her lunigianti on board - and the application for clearance at that Port was her founded ocr the a allegation that she would thereby probably for 8 days save on her voyage, and that there were greater faciliters for clearing Hongkong. + Macar than at The application was supported by the Emigration officer and the Acting Attorney General but was refused. of Hongkong, but was by Lii } Sin A Pouring ou the grotted (1) that thruese Port Macas was not a themese. and (2) that it was mucertain whattier a British fousul would always be maintained there. these appeared to us insufficient pounds for the decision- and Sir 2 Bulwer Lytton having in that opinion, J. con carid conveyed to sir I. Bowring his disapproval of it. Sir J. Bororing's present Prepalch is au Lytton. auswer to that of Sir E. Bulars 3. He exprepes his satisfaction that the Secretary of Stater decision on the case did not reach hen until recent eacute had prepared The
2026-05-18 13:41:55 · Baseline
View content

اردادي

116

zane

Februariglast. The Royal George wal

chartered by M. Gerard- she was measured, fitted, and inspected at Houghong before proceeding to Macas to take her lunigianti on board - and the application for

clearance at that Port was

her

founded

ocr

the a

allegation

that

she would thereby probably

for 8 days

save

on her voyage, and

that there were greater faciliters

for clearing

Hongkong.

+ Macar than at

The application was

supported by the Emigration officer

and the Acting Attorney

General

but was refused.

of Hongkong, but was

by

Lii

}

Sin A Pouring

ou the grotted (1) that

thruese Port

Macas was not a themese.

and (2) that it was mucertain

whattier

a

British fousul

would

always be maintained there.

these appeared to us insufficient

pounds for the decision- and Sir 2 Bulwer Lytton having

in that opinion,

J.

con carid

conveyed to sir

I. Bowring his disapproval of it.

Sir J. Bororing's present Prepalch

is au

Lytton.

auswer

to that of Sir E. Bulars

3. He exprepes his satisfaction

that the Secretary

of Stater decision

on the case did not reach hen

until recent eacute had prepared

The

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.